Other

academic-norm-review

Detects content similarity, verifies standardized citations and abbreviations, and flags potential academic integrity risks; use it before submission, during academic writing QA, or for compliance reviews.

86100Total Score
Core Capability
85 / 100
Functional Suitability
11 / 12
Reliability
9 / 12
Performance & Context
7 / 8
Agent Usability
14 / 16
Human Usability
8 / 8
Security
11 / 12
Maintainability
9 / 12
Agent-Specific
16 / 20
Medical Task
20 / 20 Passed
90Pre-submission screening: Run a final compliance check on a manuscript before journal/conference submission
4/4
86Academic writing quality control: Ensure citations, references, and abbreviations follow consistent standards across a draft
4/4
85Citation verification
4/4
85Checks citation formatting and completeness
4/4
85End-to-end case for Citation verification
4/4

Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration

Skill Veto✓ All 4 gates passed
✓
Operational Stability
System remains stable across varied inputs and edge cases
PASS
✓
Structural Consistency
Output structure conforms to expected skill contract format
PASS
✓
Result Determinism
Equivalent inputs produce semantically equivalent outputs
PASS
✓
System Security
No prompt injection, data leakage, or unsafe tool use detected
PASS

Core Capability85 / 100 — 8 Categories

Functional Suitability
Functional suitability was softened by the legacy issue 'Improve stress-case output rigor'. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
11 / 12
92%
Reliability
Reliability was softened by the legacy issue 'Improve stress-case output rigor'. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
9 / 12
75%
Performance & Context
The archived evaluation left some headroom for academic-norm-review under performance context.
7 / 8
88%
Agent Usability
A modest deduction remained in agent usability for academic-norm-review in the archived review.
14 / 16
88%
Human Usability
No point loss was recorded for human usability in the legacy audit.
8 / 8
100%
Security
A modest deduction remained in security for academic-norm-review in the archived review.
11 / 12
92%
Maintainability
A modest deduction remained in maintainability for academic-norm-review in the archived review.
9 / 12
75%
Agent-Specific
Agent specific was softened by the legacy issue 'Improve stress-case output rigor'. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
16 / 20
80%
Core Capability Total85 / 100

Medical TaskExecution Average: 86.2 / 100 — Assertions: 20/20 Passed

90
Canonical
Pre-submission screening: Run a final compliance check on a manuscript before journal/conference submission
4/4 ✓
86
Variant A
Academic writing quality control: Ensure citations, references, and abbreviations follow consistent standards across a draft
4/4 ✓
85
Edge
Citation verification
4/4 ✓
85
Variant B
Checks citation formatting and completeness
4/4 ✓
85
Stress
End-to-end case for Citation verification
4/4 ✓
90
Canonical✅ Pass
Pre-submission screening: Run a final compliance check on a manuscript before journal/conference submission

This canonical case stayed within the packaged analysis boundary and kept a reviewable task contract.

Basic 36/40|Specialized 54/60|Total 90/100
✅A1The academic-norm-review output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
86
Variant A✅ Pass
Academic writing quality control: Ensure citations, references, and abbreviations follow consistent standards across a draft

The archived run treated Academic writing quality control: Ensure citations, references, and... as a bounded analysis workflow rather than a purely narrative instruction path.

Basic 34/40|Specialized 52/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The academic-norm-review output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
85
Edge✅ Pass
Citation verification

The archived run treated Citation verification as a bounded analysis workflow rather than a purely narrative instruction path.

Basic 33/40|Specialized 52/60|Total 85/100
✅A1The academic-norm-review output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
85
Variant B✅ Pass
Checks citation formatting and completeness

Checks citation formatting and completeness remained tied to the documented analysis contract even when the preserved evidence centered on instructions instead of a full rerun.

Basic 32/40|Specialized 53/60|Total 85/100
✅A1The academic-norm-review output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
85
Stress✅ Pass
End-to-end case for Citation verification

End-to-end case for Citation verification remained tied to the documented analysis contract even when the preserved evidence centered on instructions instead of a full rerun.

Basic 29/40|Specialized 56/60|Total 85/100
✅A1The academic-norm-review output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
Medical Task Total86.2 / 100

Key Strengths

  • Primary routing is Other with execution mode A
  • Static quality score is 85/100 and dynamic average is 77.6/100
  • Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
  • Execution verification summary: No script verification was applicable