Academic Writing
biomed-outline-generator
Generates structured biomedical outlines for review articles, discussion sections, and thesis proposals. Use when a user provides biomedical keywords, results/discussion text, or a proposal title plus background and needs a directly usable academic writing scaffold.
90100Total Score
Core Capability
82 / 100
Functional Suitability
11 / 12
Reliability
10 / 12
Performance & Context
8 / 8
Agent Usability
13 / 16
Human Usability
6 / 8
Security
9 / 12
Maintainability
9 / 12
Agent-Specific
16 / 20
Medical Task
20 / 20 Passed
100You provide research directions, keywords, or a brief topic description and want a review article outline
4/4
96You paste Results/Discussion paragraphs (data descriptions, observations, statistics) and want a paper discussion outline
4/4
94Validate domain and sufficiency
4/4
94Build the section skeleton
4/4
94Final safety and writing pass
4/4
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
Skill Veto✓ All 4 gates passed
✓
Operational Stability
System remains stable across varied inputs and edge cases
PASS✓
Structural Consistency
Output structure conforms to expected skill contract format
PASS✓
Result Determinism
Equivalent inputs produce semantically equivalent outputs
PASS✓
System Security
No prompt injection, data leakage, or unsafe tool use detected
PASSResearch Veto✅ PASS — Applicable
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | The archived evaluation preserved source-faithful writing behavior without adding unsupported results or conclusions. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | Practice boundaries held because the package kept to Generates structured biomedical outlines for review articles, discussion sections, and... instead of claiming new evidence. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | The older review treated the package logic as methodologically aligned with its stated workflow. |
| Code Usability | N/A | The core deliverable is textual rather than executable, which makes code usability not applicable in this case. |
Core Capability82 / 100 — 8 Categories
Functional Suitability
Functional fit remained strong, though the final communication package could still be a little tighter.
11 / 12
92%
Reliability
The package stayed usable overall, although more consistent behavior across edge dissemination cases would help.
10 / 12
83%
Performance & Context
Performance context reached full score in the archived evaluation.
8 / 8
100%
Agent Usability
The archived score suggests slightly clearer routing would help an agent choose the right dissemination path faster.
13 / 16
81%
Human Usability
Related legacy finding for biomed-outline-generator: Minor polish before wide rollout. No major defects found
6 / 8
75%
Security
Security scored well, though the archived review still left some room to state source-faithful boundaries more explicitly.
9 / 12
75%
Maintainability
Maintainability stayed solid, with modest room to simplify or consolidate the conversion workflow.
9 / 12
75%
Agent-Specific
The package is strongly agent-oriented, with only modest headroom in routing precision and edge-case handling.
16 / 20
80%
Core Capability Total82 / 100
Medical TaskExecution Average: 95.6 / 100 — Assertions: 20/20 Passed
100
Canonical
You provide research directions, keywords, or a brief topic description and want a review article outline
4/4 ✓
96
Variant A
You paste Results/Discussion paragraphs (data descriptions, observations, statistics) and want a paper discussion outline
4/4 ✓
94
Edge
Validate domain and sufficiency
4/4 ✓
94
Variant B
Build the section skeleton
4/4 ✓
94
Stress
Final safety and writing pass
4/4 ✓
100
Canonical✅ Pass
You provide research directions, keywords, or a brief topic description and want a review article outline
For You provide research directions, keywords, or a brief topic..., the preserved evidence is lightweight but positive: the packaged validation command behaved as expected.
Basic 37/40|Specialized 60/60|Total 100/100
✅A1The biomed-outline-generator output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
96
Variant A✅ Pass
You paste Results/Discussion paragraphs (data descriptions, observations, statistics) and want a paper discussion outline
For You paste Results/Discussion paragraphs (data descriptions,..., the preserved evidence is lightweight but positive: the packaged validation command behaved as expected.
Basic 35/40|Specialized 60/60|Total 96/100
✅A1The biomed-outline-generator output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
94
Edge✅ Pass
Validate domain and sufficiency
The Validate domain and sufficiency path verified the packaged helper command without exposing a deeper execution issue.
Basic 34/40|Specialized 60/60|Total 94/100
✅A1The biomed-outline-generator output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
94
Variant B✅ Pass
Build the section skeleton
The archived run for Build the section skeleton confirmed the helper entrypoint and left the workflow in a stable state.
Basic 33/40|Specialized 60/60|Total 94/100
✅A1The biomed-outline-generator output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
94
Stress✅ Pass
Final safety and writing pass
For Final safety and writing pass, the preserved evidence is lightweight but positive: the packaged validation command behaved as expected.
Basic 30/40|Specialized 60/60|Total 94/100
✅A1The biomed-outline-generator output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
Medical Task Total95.6 / 100
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Academic Writing with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 82/100 and dynamic average is 82.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
- Execution verification summary: Script verification 1/1; adjustment=5. validate_skill.py: OK