iacuc-protocol-drafter
Draft IACUC protocol applications with focus on the 3Rs principles justification.
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | The archived evaluation preserved source-faithful writing behavior without adding unsupported results or conclusions. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | Practice boundaries held because the package kept to Draft IACUC protocol applications with focus on the 3Rs principles justification instead of claiming new evidence. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | No methodological-grounding issue was recorded for iacuc-protocol-drafter in the archived evaluation. |
| Code Usability | N/A | The audited output is a narrative or formatting deliverable rather than a code-first scientific workflow. |
Core Capability88 / 100 — 8 Categories
Medical TaskExecution Average: 83.6 / 100 — Assertions: 18/20 Passed
The archived evaluation treated Draft IACUC protocol applications with focus on the 3Rs principles... as a clean in-scope run.
The archived evaluation treated Use this skill for academic writing tasks that require explicit... as a clean in-scope run.
For Draft IACUC protocol applications with focus on the 3Rs principles..., the preserved evidence is lightweight but positive: the packaged validation command behaved as expected.
For Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py, the preserved evidence is lightweight but positive: the packaged validation command behaved as expected.
This stress case was mostly intact, but the archived review centered its concern on: The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective.
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Academic Writing with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 88/100 and dynamic average is 83.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review