Other

mindmap-helper

Organize requirements into Markdown/JSON mind map structures; use when you need a hierarchical outline for mind map tools (e.g., XMind, ProcessOn, FreeMind) or for documentation planning.

86100Total Score
Core Capability
85 / 100
Functional Suitability
11 / 12
Reliability
9 / 12
Performance & Context
7 / 8
Agent Usability
14 / 16
Human Usability
8 / 8
Security
11 / 12
Maintainability
9 / 12
Agent-Specific
16 / 20
Medical Task
20 / 20 Passed
90Converting product requirements into a clear multi-level outline for review and alignment
4/4
86Preparing a mind map document to import into tools like XMind, ProcessOn, or FreeMind
4/4
85Builds a hierarchical mind map structure from a topic, requirements, or notes
4/4
85Supports two output formats:
4/4
85End-to-end case for Builds a hierarchical mind map structure from a topic, requirements, or notes
4/4

Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration

Skill Veto✓ All 4 gates passed
✓
Operational Stability
System remains stable across varied inputs and edge cases
PASS
✓
Structural Consistency
Output structure conforms to expected skill contract format
PASS
✓
Result Determinism
Equivalent inputs produce semantically equivalent outputs
PASS
✓
System Security
No prompt injection, data leakage, or unsafe tool use detected
PASS

Core Capability85 / 100 — 8 Categories

Functional Suitability
Functional suitability was softened by the legacy issue 'Improve stress-case output rigor'. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
11 / 12
92%
Reliability
Related legacy finding for mindmap-helper: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
9 / 12
75%
Performance & Context
A modest deduction remained in performance context for mindmap-helper in the archived review.
7 / 8
88%
Agent Usability
A modest deduction remained in agent usability for mindmap-helper in the archived review.
14 / 16
88%
Human Usability
The legacy audit gave full marks to human usability for this package.
8 / 8
100%
Security
The archived evaluation left some headroom for mindmap-helper under security.
11 / 12
92%
Maintainability
A modest deduction remained in maintainability for mindmap-helper in the archived review.
9 / 12
75%
Agent-Specific
Agent specific was softened by the legacy issue 'Improve stress-case output rigor'. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
16 / 20
80%
Core Capability Total85 / 100

Medical TaskExecution Average: 86.2 / 100 — Assertions: 20/20 Passed

90
Canonical
Converting product requirements into a clear multi-level outline for review and alignment
4/4 ✓
86
Variant A
Preparing a mind map document to import into tools like XMind, ProcessOn, or FreeMind
4/4 ✓
85
Edge
Builds a hierarchical mind map structure from a topic, requirements, or notes
4/4 ✓
85
Variant B
Supports two output formats:
4/4 ✓
85
Stress
End-to-end case for Builds a hierarchical mind map structure from a topic, requirements, or notes
4/4 ✓
90
CanonicalPass
Converting product requirements into a clear multi-level outline for review and alignment

This canonical case stayed within the packaged analysis boundary and kept a reviewable task contract.

Basic 36/40|Specialized 54/60|Total 90/100
A1The mindmap-helper output structure matches the documented deliverable
A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
86
Variant APass
Preparing a mind map document to import into tools like XMind, ProcessOn, or FreeMind

Preparing a mind map document to import into tools like XMind,... remained tied to the documented analysis contract even when the preserved evidence centered on instructions instead of a full rerun.

Basic 34/40|Specialized 52/60|Total 86/100
A1The mindmap-helper output structure matches the documented deliverable
A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
85
EdgePass
Builds a hierarchical mind map structure from a topic, requirements, or notes

Builds a hierarchical mind map structure from a topic,... remained tied to the documented analysis contract even when the preserved evidence centered on instructions instead of a full rerun.

Basic 33/40|Specialized 52/60|Total 85/100
A1The mindmap-helper output structure matches the documented deliverable
A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
85
Variant BPass
Supports two output formats:

The archived run treated Supports two output formats: as a bounded analysis workflow rather than a purely narrative instruction path.

Basic 32/40|Specialized 53/60|Total 85/100
A1The mindmap-helper output structure matches the documented deliverable
A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
85
StressPass
End-to-end case for Builds a hierarchical mind map structure from a topic, requirements, or notes

This stress case stayed within the packaged analysis boundary and kept a reviewable task contract.

Basic 29/40|Specialized 56/60|Total 85/100
A1The mindmap-helper output structure matches the documented deliverable
A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
Medical Task Total86.2 / 100

Key Strengths

  • Primary routing is Other with execution mode A
  • Static quality score is 85/100 and dynamic average is 77.6/100
  • Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
  • Execution verification summary: No script verification was applicable