Evidence Insight
patent-claim-mapper
Use when mapping patent claims to products, analyzing patent infringement, or preparing freedom-to-operate analyses. Compares patent claims against product features for biotech and pharmaceutical IP assessment.
85100Total Score
Core Capability
88 / 100
Functional Suitability
11 / 12
Reliability
10 / 12
Performance & Context
8 / 8
Agent Usability
14 / 16
Human Usability
8 / 8
Security
10 / 12
Maintainability
10 / 12
Agent-Specific
17 / 20
Medical Task
18 / 20 Passed
90Use when mapping patent claims to products, analyzing patent infringement, or preparing freedom-to-operate analyses. Compares patent claims against product features for biotech and pharmaceutical IP assessment
4/4
86Use this skill for evidence insight tasks that require explicit assumptions, bounded scope, and a reproducible output format
4/4
84Use when mapping patent claims to products, analyzing patent infringement, or preparing freedom-to-operate analyses. Compares patent claims against product features for biotech and pharmaceutical IP assessment
4/4
82Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py
4/4
76End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Use when mapping patent claims to products, analyzing patent infringement, or preparing freedom-to-operate analyses. Compares patent claims against product features for biotech and pharmaceutical IP assessment
2/4
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
Skill Veto✓ All 4 gates passed
✓
Operational Stability
System remains stable across varied inputs and edge cases
PASS✓
Structural Consistency
Output structure conforms to expected skill contract format
PASS✓
Result Determinism
Equivalent inputs produce semantically equivalent outputs
PASS✓
System Security
No prompt injection, data leakage, or unsafe tool use detected
PASSResearch Veto✅ PASS — Applicable
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | The legacy review kept patent-claim-mapper tied to supported scientific content rather than invented findings. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The package stayed in retrieval, extraction, or evidence-organization scope rather than drifting into unsupported interpretation. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | The workflow stayed grounded in its declared rubric or scale-selection logic rather than improvised criteria. |
| Code Usability | PASS | The legacy audit did not flag code-usability issues for the packaged patent-claim-mapper workflow. |
Core Capability88 / 100 — 8 Categories
Functional Suitability
A modest deduction remained in functional suitability for patent-claim-mapper in the archived review.
11 / 12
92%
Reliability
The archived deduction in reliability traces back to: Stabilize executable path and fallback behavior. Some inputs only reached PARTIAL due to execution gaps or weak boundary handling
10 / 12
83%
Performance & Context
Performance context reached full score in the archived evaluation.
8 / 8
100%
Agent Usability
A modest deduction remained in agent usability for patent-claim-mapper in the archived review.
14 / 16
88%
Human Usability
The legacy audit gave full marks to human usability for this package.
8 / 8
100%
Security
A modest deduction remained in security for patent-claim-mapper in the archived review.
10 / 12
83%
Maintainability
A modest deduction remained in maintainability for patent-claim-mapper in the archived review.
10 / 12
83%
Agent-Specific
Related legacy finding for patent-claim-mapper: Stabilize executable path and fallback behavior. Some inputs only reached PARTIAL due to execution gaps or weak boundary handling
17 / 20
85%
Core Capability Total88 / 100
Medical TaskExecution Average: 83.6 / 100 — Assertions: 18/20 Passed
90
Canonical
Use when mapping patent claims to products, analyzing patent infringement, or preparing freedom-to-operate analyses. Compares patent claims against product features for biotech and pharmaceutical IP assessment
4/4 ✓
86
Variant A
Use this skill for evidence insight tasks that require explicit assumptions, bounded scope, and a reproducible output format
4/4 ✓
84
Edge
Use when mapping patent claims to products, analyzing patent infringement, or preparing freedom-to-operate analyses. Compares patent claims against product features for biotech and pharmaceutical IP assessment
4/4 ✓
82
Variant B
Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py
4/4 ✓
76
Stress
End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Use when mapping patent claims to products, analyzing patent infringement, or preparing freedom-to-operate analyses. Compares patent claims against product features for biotech and pharmaceutical IP assessment
2/4 ✓
90
Canonical✅ Pass
Use when mapping patent claims to products, analyzing patent infringement, or preparing freedom-to-operate analyses. Compares patent claims against product features for biotech and pharmaceutical IP assessment
The archived evaluation treated Use when mapping patent claims to products, analyzing patent... as a clean in-scope run.
Basic 38/40|Specialized 52/60|Total 90/100
✅A1The patent-claim-mapper output structure covers required deliverable blocks
✅A2Script execution path is available (command exit code is 0)
✅A3The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective
✅A4Required research safety/boundary guidance is present without overclaims
Pass rate: 4 / 4
86
Variant A✅ Pass
Use this skill for evidence insight tasks that require explicit assumptions, bounded scope, and a reproducible output format
Use this skill for evidence insight tasks that require explicit... remained well-aligned with the documented contract in the preserved audit.
Basic 36/40|Specialized 50/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The patent-claim-mapper output structure covers required deliverable blocks
✅A2Script execution path is available (command exit code is 0)
✅A3The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective
✅A4Required research safety/boundary guidance is present without overclaims
Pass rate: 4 / 4
84
Edge✅ Pass
Use when mapping patent claims to products, analyzing patent infringement, or preparing freedom-to-operate analyses. Compares patent claims against product features for biotech and pharmaceutical IP assessment
The archived run for Use when mapping patent claims to products, analyzing patent... confirmed the helper entrypoint and left the workflow in a stable state.
Basic 35/40|Specialized 49/60|Total 84/100
✅A1The patent-claim-mapper output structure covers required deliverable blocks
✅A2Script execution path is available (command exit code is 0)
✅A3The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective
✅A4Required research safety/boundary guidance is present without overclaims
Pass rate: 4 / 4
82
Variant B✅ Pass
Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py
Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py remained well-aligned with the documented contract in the preserved audit.
Basic 34/40|Specialized 48/60|Total 82/100
✅A1The patent-claim-mapper output structure covers required deliverable blocks
✅A2Script execution path is available (command exit code is 0)
✅A3The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective
✅A4Required research safety/boundary guidance is present without overclaims
Pass rate: 4 / 4
76
Stress✅ Pass
End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Use when mapping patent claims to products, analyzing patent infringement, or preparing freedom-to-operate analyses. Compares patent claims against product features for biotech and pharmaceutical IP assessment
This stress case was mostly intact, but the archived review centered its concern on: The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective.
Basic 31/40|Specialized 45/60|Total 76/100
✅A1The patent-claim-mapper output structure covers required deliverable blocks
✅A2Script execution path is available (command exit code is 0)
❌A3The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective
❌A4Required research safety/boundary guidance is present without overclaims
Pass rate: 2 / 4
Medical Task Total83.6 / 100
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Evidence Insight with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 88/100 and dynamic average is 83.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review