Other

plan-generator

Automatically generates a Markdown final-exam review plan or lab experiment schedule when you provide a date range, tasks/items, and available daily hours (via interactive prompts or a one-time JSON input).

90100Total Score
Core Capability
83 / 100
Functional Suitability
11 / 12
Reliability
10 / 12
Performance & Context
8 / 8
Agent Usability
13 / 16
Human Usability
7 / 8
Security
9 / 12
Maintainability
9 / 12
Agent-Specific
16 / 20
Medical Task
20 / 20 Passed
99You need a final exam review plan across a specific start/end date range
4/4
95You need a lab experiment schedule that allocates tasks by duration within a time window
4/4
93Supports two plan types:
4/4
93Review plan (course/exam-oriented)
4/4
93End-to-end case for Supports two plan types:
4/4

Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration

Skill Veto✓ All 4 gates passed
✓
Operational Stability
System remains stable across varied inputs and edge cases
PASS
✓
Structural Consistency
Output structure conforms to expected skill contract format
PASS
✓
Result Determinism
Equivalent inputs produce semantically equivalent outputs
PASS
✓
System Security
No prompt injection, data leakage, or unsafe tool use detected
PASS

Core Capability83 / 100 — 8 Categories

Functional Suitability
The archived deduction in functional suitability traces back to: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
11 / 12
92%
Reliability
Reliability was softened by the legacy issue 'Improve stress-case output rigor'. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
10 / 12
83%
Performance & Context
No point loss was recorded for performance context in the legacy audit.
8 / 8
100%
Agent Usability
A modest deduction remained in agent usability for plan-generator in the archived review.
13 / 16
81%
Human Usability
A modest deduction remained in human usability for plan-generator in the archived review.
7 / 8
88%
Security
The legacy audit deducted points for plan-generator in security.
9 / 12
75%
Maintainability
The archived evaluation left some headroom for plan-generator under maintainability.
9 / 12
75%
Agent-Specific
Agent specific was softened by the legacy issue 'Improve stress-case output rigor'. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
16 / 20
80%
Core Capability Total83 / 100

Medical TaskExecution Average: 94.6 / 100 — Assertions: 20/20 Passed

99
Canonical
You need a final exam review plan across a specific start/end date range
4/4 ✓
95
Variant A
You need a lab experiment schedule that allocates tasks by duration within a time window
4/4 ✓
93
Edge
Supports two plan types:
4/4 ✓
93
Variant B
Review plan (course/exam-oriented)
4/4 ✓
93
Stress
End-to-end case for Supports two plan types:
4/4 ✓
99
Canonical✅ Pass
You need a final exam review plan across a specific start/end date range

For You need a final exam review plan across a specific start/end date range, the preserved evidence is lightweight but positive: the packaged validation command behaved as expected.

Basic 38/40|Specialized 60/60|Total 99/100
✅A1The plan-generator output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
95
Variant A✅ Pass
You need a lab experiment schedule that allocates tasks by duration within a time window

For You need a lab experiment schedule that allocates tasks by duration..., the preserved evidence is lightweight but positive: the packaged validation command behaved as expected.

Basic 36/40|Specialized 59/60|Total 95/100
✅A1The plan-generator output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
93
Edge✅ Pass
Supports two plan types:

For Supports two plan types:, the preserved evidence is lightweight but positive: the packaged validation command behaved as expected.

Basic 35/40|Specialized 58/60|Total 93/100
✅A1The plan-generator output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
93
Variant B✅ Pass
Review plan (course/exam-oriented)

The Review plan (course/exam-oriented) path verified the packaged helper command without exposing a deeper execution issue.

Basic 34/40|Specialized 59/60|Total 93/100
✅A1The plan-generator output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
93
Stress✅ Pass
End-to-end case for Supports two plan types:

The End-to-end case for Supports two plan types: path verified the packaged helper command without exposing a deeper execution issue.

Basic 31/40|Specialized 60/60|Total 93/100
✅A1The plan-generator output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
Medical Task Total94.6 / 100

Key Strengths

  • Primary routing is Other with execution mode B
  • Static quality score is 83/100 and dynamic average is 81.6/100
  • Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
  • Execution verification summary: Script verification 2/2; adjustment=5. plan_generator.py: OK; validate_skill.py: OK